By "pseudoPascal," I mean merely that I take liberties with the details of Pascal, such as the exact names of primitive operations (e.g. "there is more input") and the exact ways that keywords are used, as mentioned in the previous note on Pascal. By "schematic," I mean that pieces of the program whose inner details are not important to the current discussion are described, rather than given in full (e.g. "write the sums"). But, do not make the mistake of thinking that the example is vague. You should be able to fill in the missing details, and correct to genuine Pascal, in totally obvious ways. In the materials that you write for those parts of assignments that do not require working programs, you may take similar liberties. But, the correct details must always be absolutely obvious. If there is more than one apparent way to interpret a pseudoprogram, I will not assume that you intended the right one.